Current:Home > ContactAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -TradeBridge
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-25 10:01:33
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (24)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Most of the email in your inbox isn't useful. Instead of managing it, try ignoring it
- The Push For Internet Voting Continues, Mostly Thanks To One Guy
- Planning for a space mission to last more than 50 years
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Keller Rinaudo: How can delivery drones save lives?
- Apple fires #AppleToo leader as part of leak probe. She says it's retaliation
- Elizabeth Holmes grilled by prosecutors on witness stand in her criminal fraud trial
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Students are still struggling to get internet. The infrastructure law could help
Ranking
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Facebook whistleblower isn't protected from possible company retaliation, experts say
- Facebook wants to lean into the metaverse. Here's what it is and how it will work
- Everything Everywhere All at Once's Best Picture Win Celebrates Weirdness in the Oscar Universe
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Oscars 2023: Anne Heche, Charlbi Dean and More Left Out of In Memoriam Segment
- Megan Thee Stallion Makes Rare Red Carpet Appearance Nearly 3 Months After Tory Lanez Trial
- Astronomers want NASA to build a giant space telescope to peer at alien Earths
Recommendation
Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
Sudan military factions at war with each other leave civilians to cower as death toll tops 100
Pregnant Rihanna's 2023 Oscars Performance Lifted Up Everyone, Including A$AP Rocky
Mexican tourist shot to death during robbery in resort town of Tulum
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Harry Shum Jr. Explains Why There Hasn't Been a Crazy Rich Asians Sequel Yet
El Salvador Just Became The First Country To Accept Bitcoin As Legal Tender
Oscars 2023: See All the Couples Bringing Movie Magic to the Red Carpet