Current:Home > MyPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -TradeBridge
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-18 13:01:00
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at cara.tabachnick@cbsinteractive.com
veryGood! (13988)
Related
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- NYC trio charged with hate crimes linked to pro-Palestinian vandalism of museum officials’ homes
- Abortion rights at forefront of Women’s March rallies in runup to Election Day
- From UConn three-peat to Duke star Cooper Flagg, the top men's basketball storylines to watch
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Dawn Staley is more than South Carolina's women's basketball coach. She's a transcendent star.
- Travis Barker’s Son Landon Barker Towers Over Him in New Photo Revealing Massive Height Difference
- Man arrested after federal officials say he sought to destroy Nashville power site
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Quincy Jones, Legendary Producer and Music Icon, Dead at 91
Ranking
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Make your own peanut butter cups at home with Reese's new deconstructed kits
- Florida prosecutor says 17-year-old suspect in Halloween fatal shootings will be charged as adult
- IRS raises 401(k) contribution limits, adds super catch-up for 60-63 year olds in 2025
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Olivia Rodrigo Reveals Her Biggest Dating Red Flag
- NFL trade deadline live updates: Latest news, rumors, analysis ahead of Tuesday's cutoff
- See Taylor Swift, Andrea Swift and Donna Kelce Unite to Cheer on Travis Kelce
Recommendation
Small twin
Search for 4 missing boaters in California suspended after crews find 1 child dead and 1 alive
NFL trade deadline: Ranking 10 best players who still might be available
James Van Der Beek reveals colon cancer diagnosis: 'I'm feeling good'
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
Cowboys' drama-filled season has already spiraled out of control
NFL flexes Colts vs. Jets out of Week 11 'SNF' schedule, moving Bengals vs. Chargers in
You may have blocked someone on X but now they can see your public posts anyway